The Personal Recommendation Hall of Fame

Tools    








Parasite

Moon-gwang: What are you, a family of charlatans?

If you haven't seen this --- DO NOT f@ckin read this!!

Seeing just how well it worked for @cricket, I did the exact same thing and went into this completely blind. Having no idea what the story was or which genre(s) it was made in.
And I am so happy I did!

Like cricket I was pretty surprised with how much i laughed during this dark comedy. In fact,
WARNING: "to anyone who has seen this:" spoilers below
was one of the loudest laughs when the wife nonchalantly kicks the housekeeper down the stairs?
It was for me.


I'm a fan of Director Bong Joon Ho and an even bigger fan of the father played by Kang-ho Song since I first saw him playing The Weird in The Good, The Bad & The Weird and here we get a wonderful blend of genres that Ho has done extraordinary work in, creating something funny, dark and as we proceed deeper within, disturbing. But what a ride it is!

Since I do not want to spoil anything for those who haven't seen it so that they can have the same exciting experience, it's going to be rather tricky to write any kind of actual review.
Make that d@mn near impossible. So, again, if you haven't seen this -- seriously, stop f@ckin reading this, already!

I can say that I thoroughly enjoyed both the Kim and Park families, with the daughter of the Kim family having such an agile mindset in getting things accomplished. And how proud her parents were about it made me laugh.
When I saw how quickly the Kims were able to establish themselves so early in the moive I was incredibly intrigued to see how things would go sideways. And when they did and just how far it goes, my mouth and eyes were the size of saucers for the second half of the film.

There are a number of nods to Alfred Hitchcock in this film of dark comedy within a dramatic tale that unfolds into a thriller. If Hitchcock was alive I'm pretty d@mn sure he'd absolutely love this film.
Bong Joon Ho's cinematography is gorgeous and a beautiful aid to the dialogue and actions of the characters throughout this film.
And while I have not seen any of the other films that were nominated for Best Picture for 2019 -- f@ckit, it deserves it's win.
I was just the opposite. I watched this and then I happened to watch The Good, the Bad and the Weird for the westerns countdown. I said hey there's that dude that was so great in Parasite.

Glad you liked it!



The trick is not minding
Sullivan's Travels


Sullivan has a problem. He's a director known for his comedies but wants to be taken seriously, and as such, direct serious work. his bosses scoff at him. What does he know bout social commentary, specifically the poor who he aims to explore? Reluctantly, he agrees, and decides to act poor and live among them to experience that kind of life. what follows is a deep,funny and occasionally dark comedy that hit all the right notes for me. Joel McCrea plays Sullivan, a naive director stuck in a loveless marriage. he experiences hardship from the get go. Along the way he meets with a would be actress, Played by Veronica Lake. Lake brightens up he screen when ever she is on. you can't keep your eyes off of her. The two experience an adventure,before the film takes a very dark turn that only furthers the social commentary. This film is amazing, and I could write more about it but to do so requires giving away some of the plot. Whats surprising is how well it holds up 80 years later.
Thanks for the recc whoever!



WARNING: "to anyone who has seen this:" spoilers below
was one of the loudest laughs when the wife nonchalantly kicks the housekeeper down the stairs?
It was for me.
, loved that whole montage, love the good bad weird too, except the fact that real horses got hurt during filming, but I didn't know that beforehand.



Sullivan's Travels seemed like a random nomination but it turned out to be another great one. I also thought highly of it when I watched it for the 40's countdown.



Trouble with a capital "T"
I had to check to see if I was the one who chose Sullivan's Travels for Wyldesyde...ha I wasn't but yeah great film. Glad to see he liked it.



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
I was just the opposite. I watched this and then I happened to watch The Good, the Bad and the Weird for the westerns countdown. I said hey there's that dude that was so great in Parasite.

Glad you liked it!
very much so.
What did you think of Good/Bad/Weird? Can't remember if I saw you mention anything about it
__________________
What I actually said to win MovieGal's heart:
- I might not be a real King of Kinkiness, but I make good pancakes
~Mr Minio



The trick is not minding
Sullivan's Travels seemed like a random nomination but it turned out to be another great one. I also thought highly of it when I watched it for the 40's countdown.
I didn’t think of it as random, considering it’s lofty status among critics and appearing in multiple Top 100 lists



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
I still haven't seen Sullivan's Travels in full. I have seen the second half of it a year or two ago when things got serious and I thought: I guess I missed the comedic parts. . . I DO what to see it in its entirety.



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
, loved that whole montage, love the good bad weird too, except the fact that real horses got hurt during filming, but I didn't know that beforehand.
Didn't know about the horses being hurt. Though thinking back, I did wonder about that.
Great film.



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
I'm sure I could muster through.

Hey, I see you have one more choice to watch The Imposter (2012)...I've seen that, it was one of the noms in the Documentary HoF. I liked it, it's a pretty wild story. I won't say more, so it's not spoiled for you.
Yep. I was going to save Parasite for last to go out with a bang but I couldn't wait and then when I started getting issues trying to watch it only made me MORE determined. Especially seeing the opening over and over and thinking: f@ck! I gotta watch this! LOL



The trick is not minding
I still haven't seen Sullivan's Travels in full. I have seen the second half of it a year or two ago when things got serious and I thought: I guess I missed the comedic parts. . . I DO what to see it in its entirety.
Yeah, the sudden shift in tone could have been fatal in a lesser directors hands. I was concerned at first, but it works out. Definitely see it



I didn’t think of it as random, considering it’s lofty status among critics and appearing in multiple Top 100 lists
No doubt the acclaim it has is very impressive. I just haven't heard much talk about it in the forum, and I didn't see a connection to you specifically. Whoever nominated it knew what they were doing though.



The trick is not minding
No doubt the acclaim it has is very impressive. I just haven't heard much talk about it in the forum, and I didn't see a connection to you specifically. Whoever nominated it knew what they were doing though.
Oh, Its that is largely due to the fact that I don’t allow myself to be pigeonholed by any genre I will watchalmost anything, except porn




Hud
(Martin Ritt, 1963)


I first watched this shortly before the Western Countdown deadline, then again a couple weeks ago. Bumped up my rating by half a star. Excellent character-driven film about generational conflict that is elevated by three great performances (Paul Newman, Melvyn Douglas, Patricia Neal) and award-winning black-and-white cinematography that evocatively captures the sparseness of Texas cattle country. The movie shares a lot of similarities with The Last Picture Show, which is fitting given that both are based on books by Larry McMurtry, one of my favorite writers. The dialogue possesses a down-home poetry. (Simple example, instead of "want to grab a drink?" it's "want to blow some foam off some beer?" And many of Hud's lines read like a cynical quote of the day: "You don't look out for yourself, the only helping hand you'll get is when they lower the box.") Storytelling is economical. Characterization is effortless.

Within the first few scenes -- a bar owner sweeping broken glass ("Hud was in here last night."), Hud nonchalantly exiting the house of another man's wife and allowing his nephew to take the blame when the husband demands an explanation, Hud recklessly destroying the housekeeper's azaleas with his shoddy parking -- we know all we need to about Hud's character. It speaks to Newman's magnetic charm that the eponymous character remains likable -- at least up to a certain point -- despite his selfish actions and contemptible manner. I'm one of the many who find the kid in Shane insufferable, so it was a shock to discover that Lonnie, Hud's impressionable teenage nephew, is performed with such naturalism by the same actor all grown up. Almost as surprising is Melvyn Douglas, whom I primarily think of as the debonair charmer in Ninotchka, as a convincingly gruff, rugged, worn-down cattleman. Patricia Neal's housekeeper is the glue. Her one-on-one scenes with Newman are electric. I only wish she'd had more screen time. Each character is multi-dimensional. A small cast of genuine articles.

I appreciated the absence of flashbacks and exposition, with the script instead delivering the backstory piecemeal through snippets of dialogue, though certain key details of the family's history remain elusive and make me want to seek out the novel. Primary themes are nakedly discussed, with seemingly every conversation between father and son revolving around principles, along with the symbolism of sick cattle that must be put down to prevent the spread of disease. There's also a coming-of-age element with Lonnie caught between a constant tug-of-war between his primary influences --- the heavily principled, but stubborn grandfather, whose word means everything but fails to adapt to the changing times and the cool, ambitious, unscrupulous uncle, who is more suited to survive financially, even if it means cruelly bulldozing everyone around him --- as Lonnie must decide to either forge his own path in life or follow in the footsteps of others. As a character, Hud is extremely flawed. As a film, Hud is nearly flawless.



As I mentioned before, I remember @cricket recommending this to me years ago, and he knows my taste pretty well, so I'm confident that he nominated it.
__________________



Well Spaulding you are the 1st person to guess what I nominated for them. If we had a side game guessing who nominated what, you probably would have won even if I played. I thought Hud was made for you and of course I'm glad that I was right. It was an automatic nomination. I was starting to wonder though because you mentioned that you watched it a while back. That kept me in some suspense



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
It's been ages since I've seen Hud and reading Spaulding's review it reminded me of everything I had forgotten about it.
Great review, by the way!



It's been ages since I've seen Hud and reading Spaulding's review it reminded me of everything I had forgotten about it.
Great review, by the way!

Thalia: A Texas Trilogy

Larry McMurtry's first three novels, all set in the north Texas town of Thalia after World War II
I've never heard of Lovin' Molly but Sidney Lument directed it and it sounds interesting (though Anthony Perkins as a romantic lead..uh)



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
The Manchurian Candidate




It was pretty early on in the film where I figured I was going to like The Manchurian Candidate. It was when the brainwashed soldiers were being displayed to other soldiers about how obedient they can be. The intercutting between what we see, what the soldiers see and what actually happened is quite impressive. Not once was I lost in the chaos of the sequences as it was edited superbly and displayed.

A soldier returns home from the Korean War only to have recurring nightmares that one of his squad members might be a sleeper agent. Simple enough concept and The Manchurian Candidate plays with the consequences rather well. Slowly our protagonist realizes what is happening as the picture becomes clearer in his head he takes it upon himself to try and stop something that he doesn't really understand. What is the ultimate mission of Shaw? We don't know, but we're along for the ride to find out.

Believe it or not, but I think this is my first Frank Sinatra picture that I've seen. He does well for himself as does the more difficult role given to Laurence Harvey. We get a glimpse into the minds of these gentlemen, both gone to the breaking point. Angela Lansbury plays a wickedly delicious role of a very assertive mother and Janet Leigh pops up in a few scenes but feels somewhat underused.

It's interesting when I watch a film like this, I instantly want to watch the remake and see how they handled the material. I can already tell that it won't be as successful, but I will be checking that one out sooner rather than later.
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews



Perhaps I'm the only one here who can say I saw the remake first and at the drive-in

But the original is better and it was an excellent nomination. Great work Suspect!