Dead Man’s Shoes
I didn’t really know what I should’ve expected with this one based on what everyone else was saying. For that reason this was the one that I was probably the most curious to watch.
My major complaint is the unsteady camera. I have never really been a big fan of it, but at times it was very noticeable in this movie, which kind of gets on my nerves. But that is my one complaint about the film.
I know the humor in it has been mentioned in this thread. I honestly didn’t see any at all. I saw where there were scenes that were supposed to have some humor in them. And I suppose it worked. Where the humor was applied seemed to be in the scenes where they were being taunted. To me, that was more for the purpose of playing games with their minds rather than to be funny. But I didn’t really find this to be a comedy in any sort of way. All it was, to me, was a drama. Maybe even a thriller. But I definitely would never classify any of it as any sort of comedy in any way.
I actually found this a hard film to watch. I can’t stand seeing unkindness and brutality towards a person who is mentally challenged. That is something that infuriates me. And I know this is just a movie, but I found that to be really upsetting. And it was very hard to watch.
The violence didn’t bother me too much. I’ve pretty much mastered the art of looking at a scene through squinty eyes when I don’t want to see the scene completely for what it is, but I still want to follow along. So I was able to deal with that. Most of it didn’t bother me, but there were a couple of moments where it called for me to squint my eyes.
I liked that the flashbacks were in black and white. That was a good way of telling that part of the story and to keep track of when it was that part of the story.
I know that Richard was out for revenge. I don’t necessarily agree with how he went about it. But, truth be told, I can completely understand how he could’ve been driven to that point.
I think all of the actors were good in here. Paddy Considine may have been the standout, but he was also the main focus of the story. So that may be what helps him to stand out, also. Some credit should be given to Toby Kebbell. His role may be minor, but he is good as the character he is playing. And if it weren’t for his role, this story wouldn’t need to be told. (But I have to admit that I have a hard time looking at Kebbell because all I think is “How on earth did they EVER decide on having him play John Wilkes Booth?! He looks NOTHING like him!” – just a bit of the nonsense that went through my mind while watching this that I thought I’d mention).
As I said before this was a very upsetting film for me to watch. Again, I don’t care to see the brutality towards the one character. I also wasn’t overly thrilled at the twist to the story. I found that to be so depressing. It was such a downer. At the same time, it was enough of a twist to where I still thought it was a
clever twist. And it was clever because I was
really thrown off by it.
The ending wasn’t really what I wanted either, but I will take it. I kind of have to, don’t I?!
I can’t say I
enjoyed the movie because I thought it was
terribly depressing. I don’t need a movie to be “perky” in order to enjoy it, but this was just so sad for me to watch. At the same time, I thought it was a good movie. It was a very interesting nomination and I appreciate that Camo nominated it because it was something that I probably never would’ve known about to watch otherwise.
I am telling you that the twist affected me so much that it affected the rating a little.