Sabrina (1995)
Oscar-winning director Sydney Pollack brings his accustomed directorial style and polish to Sabrina, his sumptuously mounted 1995 remake of the 1954 Billy Wilder classic that featured an Oscar-nominated performance by Audrey Hepburn in the title role. Sadly, the actress in the title role in this remake is the one thing that just doesn't work.

This is the story of Sabrina Fairchild, the Plain Jane daughter of the chauffeur to the wealthy Larrabee family, whose mansion is on Long Island. For as long as she can remember, Sabrina has been obsessed with David Larrabee, the irresponsible and womanizing younger son who is second in command at the family business even though he doesn't know where his office is. In an attempt to help Sabrina get over David, her father sends her on a trip to Paris.

As Sabrina leaves for Paris, David finds himself somehow engaged to Dr. Elizabeth Tyson, whose father is about to enter into a business merger with Larrabee Communications, which is run by David's older brother, Linus, and his mother, Maude. Sabrina returns from Paris, a transformed ugly duckling but still in love with David. In order to make sure the merger goes through, Linus pretends to romance Sabrina in order to keep her away from David and save the merger with Tyson industries.

Pollack and the screenwriters display a great deal of respect to the original film by not tampering with the basic story too much. Trying to outshine the iconic Billy Wilder is not something to be taken lightly but Pollack and company do manage to bring the original story back to the screen with respect to the original. The characters are tweaked to the nth degree though...David Larrabee is way sleazier than he was in the original and Linus is a lot more calculating than he was in the original making this story of a romantic triangle where the woman is truly in love with both men more viable. I found the story of David and Sabrina more likable in the 1954 version and the story of Sabrina and Linus more likable in this version.

My problem with this version is what happens to the title character. This new Sabrina seems completely devoid of self-respect or confidence making the character just this side of pathetic, which is something I never got from the Audrey Hepburn character in 1954. Her feelings about the Larrabee brothers might have been a little muddled, but she still had some dignity and knew when she was being used. This version puts more attention on Sabrina's trip to Paris, where she was supposed to blossom, but the minute she returns to Long Island and lays eyes on David, she becomes the same insecure waif she was when she left, rendering her trip to Paris pointless, even though she actually found romance there.

Pollack is en pointe with sparkling production values, especially art direction/set direction and cinematography, and most of his casting is on the money. Harrison Ford brings a complex but charismatic quality to Linus Larrabee that I don't think Humphrey Bogart ever understood and Greg Kinnear brings more smarmy to David than William Holden did while keeping David likable. The fabulous Nancy Marchand steals every scene she's in as Maude Larrabee and Richard Crenna and Angie Dickinson are fun as Elizabeth's parents. Unfortunately, Julia Ormond is no Audrey Hepburn and it is her empty performance in the title role that keeps this remake being what it should be.
Oscar-winning director Sydney Pollack brings his accustomed directorial style and polish to Sabrina, his sumptuously mounted 1995 remake of the 1954 Billy Wilder classic that featured an Oscar-nominated performance by Audrey Hepburn in the title role. Sadly, the actress in the title role in this remake is the one thing that just doesn't work.

This is the story of Sabrina Fairchild, the Plain Jane daughter of the chauffeur to the wealthy Larrabee family, whose mansion is on Long Island. For as long as she can remember, Sabrina has been obsessed with David Larrabee, the irresponsible and womanizing younger son who is second in command at the family business even though he doesn't know where his office is. In an attempt to help Sabrina get over David, her father sends her on a trip to Paris.

As Sabrina leaves for Paris, David finds himself somehow engaged to Dr. Elizabeth Tyson, whose father is about to enter into a business merger with Larrabee Communications, which is run by David's older brother, Linus, and his mother, Maude. Sabrina returns from Paris, a transformed ugly duckling but still in love with David. In order to make sure the merger goes through, Linus pretends to romance Sabrina in order to keep her away from David and save the merger with Tyson industries.

Pollack and the screenwriters display a great deal of respect to the original film by not tampering with the basic story too much. Trying to outshine the iconic Billy Wilder is not something to be taken lightly but Pollack and company do manage to bring the original story back to the screen with respect to the original. The characters are tweaked to the nth degree though...David Larrabee is way sleazier than he was in the original and Linus is a lot more calculating than he was in the original making this story of a romantic triangle where the woman is truly in love with both men more viable. I found the story of David and Sabrina more likable in the 1954 version and the story of Sabrina and Linus more likable in this version.

My problem with this version is what happens to the title character. This new Sabrina seems completely devoid of self-respect or confidence making the character just this side of pathetic, which is something I never got from the Audrey Hepburn character in 1954. Her feelings about the Larrabee brothers might have been a little muddled, but she still had some dignity and knew when she was being used. This version puts more attention on Sabrina's trip to Paris, where she was supposed to blossom, but the minute she returns to Long Island and lays eyes on David, she becomes the same insecure waif she was when she left, rendering her trip to Paris pointless, even though she actually found romance there.

Pollack is en pointe with sparkling production values, especially art direction/set direction and cinematography, and most of his casting is on the money. Harrison Ford brings a complex but charismatic quality to Linus Larrabee that I don't think Humphrey Bogart ever understood and Greg Kinnear brings more smarmy to David than William Holden did while keeping David likable. The fabulous Nancy Marchand steals every scene she's in as Maude Larrabee and Richard Crenna and Angie Dickinson are fun as Elizabeth's parents. Unfortunately, Julia Ormond is no Audrey Hepburn and it is her empty performance in the title role that keeps this remake being what it should be.
Last edited by Gideon58; 06-04-24 at 01:14 PM.