Oscars Launch $500 Million Fundraising Drive As Viewers Flee

Tools    





"...the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences has launched a $500 million fundraising initiative in an effort to offset the Oscars dramatic drop in viewership - which went from nearly 44 million in 2014, to just 19.5 million in the latest ceremony, according to Statista."

Full article:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...draising-drive



Trouble with a capital "T"
Kind of pathetic that an awards ceremony needs half a billion in fundraising to keep afloat. Just think of all the worthy charities that could use 500 million dollars to do some real good in the world. But no, movie stars need their special night on the red carpet. The Oscars like Hollywood has lost it's appeal, let them eat cake.



The trick is not minding
It’s actually trending up, which Gulfport conveniently ignores.
But yes, the numbers have gone down this decade, although the viewership numbers have always fluctuated



What I'd like to see is a comparison between this and TV ratings in general, which have heavily fragmented.

I assume there's still a drop, though it probably isn't as dramatic.



That article is (not surprisingly) click-bait garbage, complete with the W-word

By contrast, the LA Times does a much better job of explaining exactly what this initiative involves:


Looking to safeguard its future in a world in which the Oscars have lost some of their ratings luster, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced on Friday a new $500-million global campaign aimed at extending the organization’s influence worldwide and diversifying its revenue streams.

The announcement of the Academy100 campaign, made during a press conference at Rome’s legendary Cinecittà Studios, represents a strategic push to bolster the academy’s financial stability and enhance its global stature as it approaches the milestone of its 100th Oscars ceremony in 2028. Historically, the nonprofit organization’s financial health has been closely linked to its flagship awards show, which draws a smaller audience in today’s fragmented entertainment landscape than in decades past.

According to the academy, support for the Academy100 campaign will fund and endow a variety of programs aimed at recognizing excellence in cinematic artistry, preserving film history, training and educating young filmmakers and facilitating the creation of film exhibitions, screenings and publications. More than $100 million has already been pledged to the campaign, with significant contributions from Rolex, a long-time academy partner.

“The future of the Academy is global, and Academy100 will deepen our worldwide reach and impact,” academy Chief Executive Bill Kramer said in a statement. “Like all healthy organizations, the academy needs a sustainable and diverse base of support, and we are deeply grateful to Rolex and all of our partners for helping us launch this important and forward-looking initiative.”

As the academy looks ahead to the end of its current television contract with ABC in 2028, the need to explore alternative revenue streams has become more urgent. With a boost from last summer’s “Barbenheimer” phenomenon, this year’s Oscars ceremony drew 19.5 million viewers, a 4% increase from 2023 but still less than half the 40 million who tuned in a decade ago. With the new Academy100 campaign, AMPAS is proactively looking to create new sources of revenue that could be less dependent on the broadcast model and more resilient to continued shifts in how audiences consume entertainment.

The global push comes as the organization itself widens its focus far beyond Hollywood. Since the #OscarsSoWhite firestorm in 2015, the academy has diversified its historically white-male-dominated ranks in large part by expanding its reach abroad, growing its ranks from fewer than 6,000 voting members in 2012 to more than 10,500 today. Over half of the most recent class of invitees were drawn from outside the United States.

With an eye toward that global membership, the academy plans to roll out a series of events and educational programs aimed at fostering community engagement and nurturing new talent in major cities outside America, including Buenos Aires, Cannes, Johannesburg, Kyoto and London. Such programs could boost international interest in the Oscars and other academy initiatives and help offset any potential declines in domestic viewership.

The Academy100 campaign follows an earlier, similarly ambitious fundraising effort to fund construction of the $482-million Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, which opened in September 2021 after years of delays and budget overruns. Beginning in 2027, the museum will roll out a series of special exhibitions, film programs and publications related to Oscars history ahead of the awards’ 100th anniversary.

Highlighting this pivotal moment in the organization’s long and storied history, Kramer said, “The academy will soon enter its second century, and we want to ensure that we continue to be the preeminent leader of our international film community.”



Kind of pathetic that an awards ceremony needs half a billion in fundraising to keep afloat.
AMPAS is more than just one awards show a year. Like the L.A. Times story says, they recently had another major fundraising effort to fund construction of the $482-million Academy Museum of Motion Pictures.

Ultimately, AMPAS is just trying to diversify its revenue stream, like a lot of other arts non-profits, because it knows audience fragmentation is definitely going to continue and it doesn't want to rely exclusively on its awards show.



This should go without saying, but: if you want to raise a topic like this for discussion, post a news article, and not an editorial, or the thread will have to be removed.



The general public doesn't believe whatsoever in the authenticity of the Oscars. Shakespeare in Love beating Saving Private Ryan, always a new star getting an award to hopefully cement their profitability going forward (Adrien Brody, Jennifer Lawrence who I love but is no thespian, and too many to list), and just nominating the obscure masterpiece.....but they better know that's as good as it gets.


We used to think otherwise, but we've gotten wise to the game. Peter O'Toole said it best in My Favorite Year, "I'm not an actor! I'm a movie star!". Which is funny because it was said by a real actor, not a Buet Reynolds type.


Solution is to stop making us watch awards we couldn't give a flys fack about then putting more interesting content. Have a Most Popular category separate from Best "picture-actor-ditector-etc...) then awarding both, that would keep our attention and gain them some respect.



Kind of pathetic that an awards ceremony needs half a billion in fundraising to keep afloat. Just think of all the worthy charities that could use 500 million dollars to do some real good in the world. But no, movie stars need their special night on the red carpet. The Oscars like Hollywood has lost it's appeal, let them eat cake.
Exactly. Let it die. The Will Smith slap was the end.



The Guy Who Sees Movies
The Oscars serve a purpose. They give mainstream "Hollywood" a place to all gather, dress well and congratulate themselves. As long as the fund raising is an insider thing, and they're not taking money from impoverished children, who cares. I don't know how they can possibly think they need a half billion to have a TV show on one night and some statues, but who knows. Maybe the accountants do, but I don't.



The Guy Who Sees Movies
Exactly. Let it die. The Will Smith slap was the end.
They've always been about hyperbole...what the heck.



They've always been about hyperbole...what the heck.
Less "the end" of the Oscars literally, but "the end" symbollically. For me, it marks a turn from the Oscars being something aspirational/representative of collective achievement (maybe they never were?) to a farcical reflection of an increasingly egocentric and stupid culture.



Frankly after the Riseborough incident Congress should have stepped in and investigated just where the money is going with this "organization". The do one show a year which those films have to pay them tens of thousands of dollars for screenings of films and they get money from the TV rights.



Yes, Congress absolutely needs to spend taxpayer dollars investigating 501(c)(6)s



Yes, Congress absolutely needs to spend taxpayer dollars investigating 501(c)(6)s

Yes they should because this could be yet another case of a company deliberately operating at a loss so they don't pay taxes.



Yes they should because this could be yet another case of a company deliberately operating at a loss so they don't pay taxes.
You do realize what a 501(c)(6)s is, right?



The Guy Who Sees Movies
The Oscars, as a spasm of self-righteous, self congratulation and narcissism, have always been just that. I have to admit that I watch it for the cynical satisfaction of being right about "Hollywood".