[quote=AgrippinaX][quote=exiler96]I admittedly don't watch a lot of new relases as I do older movies, but the one time that it  bothered me (from an otherwise good movie) it was bringing Ian Holm back from the dead for Alien: Romulus.
(again though, I don't see exactly how different it is from using typical special effects to make this more morally questionable...maybe it wasn't a bad use afterall, heh).[/quote]

I don’t really understand your point/angle here. ‘Typical special effects’ could never make someone who isn’t, I don’t know, Peter Cushing look like Peter Cushing.[/quote]

[quote=exiler96]I admittedly don't watch a lot of new relases as I do older movies, but the one time that it  bothered me (from an otherwise good movie) it was bringing Ian Holm back from the dead for Alien: Romulus.
(again though, I don't see exactly how different it is from using typical special effects to make this more morally questionable...maybe it wasn't a bad use afterall, heh).[/quote]

[quote=AgrippinaX][quote=mattiasflgrtll6]I would rather laugh at a really bad accent than be impressed by one achieved through a quick fix that insults the art of acting.[/quote]

Indeed.[/quote]

[quote=mattiasflgrtll6]I would rather laugh at a really bad accent than be impressed by one achieved through a quick fix that insults the art of acting.[/quote]

[quote=AgrippinaX][quote=exiler96]Just did a quick read about The Brualist's use... the drawings and the buildings mentioned remind me of typical VFX (like parts in Zodiac and other Finchers) which they prbably didn't have money for? Not an expert on it but it doesn't seem that strage (if the result "pass" for it at least)...
"Improving" the accents though is kinda awkward to read about, lol.[/quote]

And the thing is that, to be fully transparent, generally speaking, accents *are* the sort of thing I tend to complain about when done very badly (eg Alec Baldwin or whoever speaking abysmal Russian), but once AI is used to rectify this, it becomes a slippery slope.[/quote]

[quote=exiler96]Just did a quick read about The Brualist's use... the drawings and the buildings mentioned remind me of typical VFX (like parts in Zodiac and other Finchers) which they prbably didn't have money for? Not an expert on it but it doesn't seem that strage (if the result "pass" for it at least)...
"Improving" the accents though is kinda awkward to read about, lol.[/quote]

[quote=AgrippinaX]Yeah, I totally understand where you’re coming from. Deep inside I ultimately feel the same as you.[/quote]

[quote=mattiasflgrtll6]Maybe in a few years with some level of distance I'll give this movie a watch (Hopefully at least *most* of Brody's performance was actually left intact), but for now the reveal is too painful for me to give it an earnest shot. It really sucks having to pass it by.[/quote]

[quote=AgrippinaX][quote=mattiasflgrtll6][quote=Allaby]It should be noted Emilia Perez also used AI voice enhancements.  Minimal use of AI in films doesn't bother me and it sounds like the way they used it in The Brutalist was pretty minor, just to fine tune parts of the actors Hungarian dialogue.[/quote]
It wasn't only for that, they also used AI at the end for several of the architecture drawings.[/quote]

And buildings, not just drawings of buildings but actual buildings.[/quote]

[quote=mattiasflgrtll6]There is one major difference that cannot be ignored. You hire PEOPLE to do those jobs. AI can easily remove a lot of those tasks, frighteningly enough.[/quote]

[quote=Allaby]Films use other tools like makeup, visual effects, and editing to make actors look and sound better and to improve the look of films.  I don't think AI is that much different from any of the other tools used.[/quote]