I thought United started well, but kinda disappeared after the Trent disallowed goal.
We were starting to slip about that time and the goal was coming but after that it was all one way.
Early days & just three games in, but I can see visible changes in the way we are playing. More control. FBs, especially Robbo, not bombing forward. Defensively we are looking less open.
I've only see that game and highlights of your others but it's far more controlled than the 'heavy metal' football of Klopp.
Again it's all early days, but I'm all in with Slotball. Dude himself is so laid back in interviews, despite all the constant annoying Klopp comparisons.
Anyways don't want the team to get carried away, & top 4 is still the goal, but good signs to see.
I'd be stunned if you didn't make top 3. For me that's Arsenal, City and yourselves in whichever order it happens. We need top 4 this year but I'll be surprised if we get it. I said last year we'd finish anywhere from 4th-9th with 5th or 6th being most likely and we ended up 8th. I do think, with a properly fit team, we can be 6th or maybe higher if someone else has a underpar season. But I think this season is all about getting behind the scenes correct.
Just a bit about that because there's been all the screams about EtH getting sacked and how long has he got left but I've not heard anyone say what I've been thinking and I think it's fairly obvious. Which either means it is and people are missing it (on purpose in the media?) or it's so wrong that I'm a moron (and I've always said football exists to make me look a fool.) So here goes.
Obviously they were looking to replace EtH. Everyone knows that, including him because they were very open about it. Everyone knows (or should) than the hierarchy and structure at United has been/is a mess and that's a big part of the reason why so much money has been spent/wasted. The whole place has been stripped bare, hollowed out and left to run down almost since the Glazer's took over until Fergie left. Even since, the money has been spent hugely on signings and wages as the Glazers think that as starving the club of money created the problem, flooding the team with signings will solve it. The last 10 years have shown that's not true.
For whatever reason they didn't go with any of the few managers they interviewed/spoke with (my guess is they didn't feel they could work with them or they have someone/a type of manager in mind who wasn't available) and, rather than pay off EtH and his team and install a new manager they weren't sold on (and his team) only to sack them when they fail, because no one can succeed with things the way they are/have been, they decided to extend EtH's contract (which cost no money) because they think that, once the behind the scenes stuff is sorted/a year further along, that United can start to build to a real challenge and that'll mean extra money available next summer. It also means you don't 'burn' through another manager and have another failure when you're trying to be the new broom. If EtH does OK (top 4 or maybe another trophy?) then it could be him. Otherwise it will be someone else. Of course, if it goes stupidly poorly or the OT faithful turn on him, he could get sacked before the end of the season. Should that happen, I'd expect RvN to take over until the end of the season unless the person they want is available and they think they've got the behind the scene stuff sorted.
It's not been a good start for United (obviously) but we have the amount of points I thought we'd have (we could've drawn with Brighton but I thought a loss was the most likely result) and so, while the way we lost at Brighton is a worry, we are where I thought we'd be after 3 games and 3-0 was a better result than I thought we'd get (4-0) and a lot better than it should've been if everyone had scored (6-2).
The injuries are still a problem. We haven't played with a forward yet (Zirkzee isn't really a striker. He calls himself a 9 1/2 I think?) we have no midfield (we only have 5 midfielders and one of those is Mason Mount who's constantly injured) and Ugarte hasn't played yet. I think Rashford's done at United but he plays better with Shaw at LB and that hasn't happened since February. I can only assume that EtH is playing him so that, when he eventually drops him, he can say to him/the press that he's been given chances but not impressed. But as I don't think anyone would even argue, that's probably not the reason he's still playing him? Maybe it's just about taking pressure of the younger players as we also have the amount of points he expected us to have?
Yoro's young and will make mistakes but hopefully his pace and positioning will mean he can step up. I'm still not sold on Martinez (I just can't have a 5'9" CB) but he gives everything for the club and we missed that a lot last season. I'd have been tempted into moving him to an inverted wingback and coming into midfield to tackle and make an extra man, but I think Ugarte will mean that isn't necessary (and Eth Wouldn't have done it anyway) I don't think it was a surpise that we looked at our best with Varane and him as the CB pairinig. I can't even remember if they played together with Shaw at LB? It might've happened a few times? We shouldn't have been that bad last season, but we could be this as others have improved and, if we don't get together as a team, mid table could beckon. High midtable, I'll grant you (8th or 9th) but still nowhere we want to be.