Good, because I came in at the WRONG time lol.
OK, I just have this to say about the movie: it's a serious LOT to pack into three hours, but you get the Oppenheimer story from a plethora of angles and a great deal of his character, and how he affected others as well as the little ways others affected him, and that satisfies me. It was my movie of the year until I saw Across the Spider-Verse.
"Meet my arbitrary criteria or I don't have to explain myself" is an unfortunately common, and extremely transparent, way of dodging questions.
If someone doesn't like explaining their criteria, they shouldn't be on a movie forum, so I'll do mine.
1. What is the goal of this film? To greatly explore Oppenheimer's story and character while still being a cinematic experience.
2. Does it meet its goal? Yeah. The whole movie is about Oppie's personality as much as it's about his achievement, and the special effects and music felt perfectly natural somehow, likely due to Nolan's own personality.
3. Does the movie ignore or sacrifice anything to meet it's goal? Yeah: character development for other people in the long run. Perfectly directed on pretty much all accounts IMO.
4. Do other aspects of the movie make up for the sacrifices? Well, it's a lot to pack in for three hours, and we get a very strong experience with the lead character considering it's his bio. So since there's a lot to pack in, this isn't the MOST fair question, but since there are other biopics with more development for sides, I'd say it's a SLIGHT mistake.
98/100.