‘The Holdovers’ Accused of Plagiarism by ‘Luca’ Screenwriter

Tools    





Watching the second round of this fight was like seeing a boxer struggle back to his feet right at the last second before being counted out, only to immediately have a piano full of manure fall onto his head.



mattiasflgrtll6's Avatar
The truth is in here
What is that? A podcast or something? We’re using someone on YouTube to debunk the claims, now?
There are links to the sources as well if you want to dig deeper, but I found the video very insightful and straightforward about why the plagiarism claim doesn't hold much water. In fact there are so many differences that at times it really seems like Stephenson is just grasping at straws in the hopes that he will build a stronger case.

If there's any movie The Holdovers is at least closer in line with it's Merlusse:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026703/?ref_=ttcnn

But don't take my word for it. You can do the research yourself as well, just saying I don't find the case very believable.



https://deadline.com/2024/08/alexand...ns-1236044671/


“It was irresponsible of Variety to report on that without having read the scripts and comparing them themselves,” claimed Payne. “Do you think The New York Times would have done that?”

Oh look 6 months later the thing I said turns out to be true. Perhaps certain people shouldn't just blindly post Variety articles on the forum. This was a smear campaign by a patsy...notice he didn't end up suing.



What I got from the article was "Guy accused of a thing says he didn't do it."
I took another look at the article just to refresh my memory - didn't remember all of the details.

Payne and Hemingson didn't say "they didn't do it" - they simply declined to comment on the matter.

Declining to comment is a bit different from outright contesting an allegation. Sometimes it is done out of a sincere belief an accusation should not even be dignified with a denial, and sometimes not commenting is done so as to not to say something that could potentially be challenged with evidence in a court of law.

But if they felt the whole thing was a misunderstanding, they could certainly have given their side of the story and then the headline might have read much differently.



The trick is not minding
I don’t want to keep beating this dead horse, but There’s nothing in the article that definitively absolves Payne of plagiarism. It’s just him denying the allegations.



I don’t want to keep beating this dead horse, but There’s nothing in the article that definitively absolves Payne of plagiarism. It’s just him denying the allegations.
That's absolutely true.

And if, say, this matter might have been settled out of court, then that's something that we'll probably never know, because the accuser would have almost certainly signed an NDA along with the settlement, in which he agreed never to discuss the matter publicly again.

I'm not saying that's what happened, I'm just saying that if that had been what happened, we would never hear anything about it.