Most Consistent Director?

Tools    





Hirokazu Kore-eda's pretty steady, you can usually count on him to deliver a top-drawer film - of the theatrical releases I've seen, only Distance didn't work for me.
__________________
Completed Extant Filmographies: Luis Buñuel, Federico Fellini, Satyajit Ray, Fritz Lang, Andrei Tarkovsky, Buster Keaton, Yasujirō Ozu - (for favorite directors who have passed or retired, 10 minimum)



RIP www.moviejustice.com 2002-2010
I like the William Wyler and Kurosawa answers. If their names were attached to it, it was going to be good. As far as more modern directors, obviously the Coens and Paul Thomas Anderson, but also Wes Anderson and Dennis Villineuve.

I like Hitchcock a lot, but he made some huge turds too and was really one of those directors who needed to surround himself with strong collaborators and often times some of his innovative ideas got in the way and didn't translate well on film. Spellbound, Topaz, The Trouble With Harry, I Confess, The Man Who Knew Too Much, Frenzy, Family Plot... all of these had interesting ideas, but Hitchcock couldn't get out of his own way to tell a basic straightforward story. Even Marnie which is interesting has some laughably bad writing and performances from Tippi Hedron with all the psycho analyzing and going into her past. It's not bad in theory, but Hitchcock films had some God-awful writing to them. When it worked it worked, such as Notorious, North by Northwest, and even a silly premise like Vertigo or Psycho were just spot on, but Hitchcock was only as good as his writers and if his quirky camera stuff worked and many times it was hit or miss.

Don't get me wrong, I love a great Hitchock film and North by Northwest, Notorious, and Rebecca are three films in my top 100, but consistent in quality is the last word I'd use for him.
__________________
"A candy colored clown!"
Member since Fall 2002
Top 100 Films, clicky below

http://www.movieforums.com/community...ad.php?t=26201



Alfonso Cuarón, y basta!



I like the William Wyler and Kurosawa answers. If their names were attached to it, it was going to be good. As far as more modern directors, obviously the Coens and Paul Thomas Anderson, but also Wes Anderson and Dennis Villineuve.

I like Hitchcock a lot, but he made some huge turds too and was really one of those directors who needed to surround himself with strong collaborators and often times some of his innovative ideas got in the way and didn't translate well on film. Spellbound, Topaz, The Trouble With Harry, I Confess, The Man Who Knew Too Much, Frenzy, Family Plot... all of these had interesting ideas, but Hitchcock couldn't get out of his own way to tell a basic straightforward story. Even Marnie which is interesting has some laughably bad writing and performances from Tippi Hedron with all the psycho analyzing and going into her past. It's not bad in theory, but Hitchcock films had some God-awful writing to them. When it worked it worked, such as Notorious, North by Northwest, and even a silly premise like Vertigo or Psycho were just spot on, but Hitchcock was only as good as his writers and if his quirky camera stuff worked and many times it was hit or miss.

Don't get me wrong, I love a great Hitchock film and North by Northwest, Notorious, and Rebecca are three films in my top 100, but consistent in quality is the last word I'd use for him.
Wyler did more genres than Hitchcock. I have only recently discovered Kurosawa.