Just finished it.
At half way or so I thought I was going to have it down as a masterpiece.
And although I don't really understand it, I also found the last I guess 5 or 10 minutes or so to be...powerful? effective? compelling?
There was a period prior to that though of maybe half an hour where I did feel it had become a little to abstract and a little too surreal. I was never waiting for it to end as such, but I became less absorbed.
I'm not really sure what it was about. Was it about death? was it a ghost story? was there an element of sci-fi?
Regardless, I found it a largely immersive and satisfying experience. An unusual and interesting combination of styles, and in spite of not really understanding it I did also feel a level of cerebral and emotional engagement.
I'm confident that it makes my 90s ballot, even if it might not quite make my 200 masterpieces list, I would have to reflect on that.
He is a very interesting director, and I'm sure his work has influenced others.
I think your source might be different to mine CQ, but glad you've found it. My copy was not a perfect picture and a couple of issues with the sub-titles, but generally sufficient.
At half way or so I thought I was going to have it down as a masterpiece.
And although I don't really understand it, I also found the last I guess 5 or 10 minutes or so to be...powerful? effective? compelling?
There was a period prior to that though of maybe half an hour where I did feel it had become a little to abstract and a little too surreal. I was never waiting for it to end as such, but I became less absorbed.
I'm not really sure what it was about. Was it about death? was it a ghost story? was there an element of sci-fi?
Regardless, I found it a largely immersive and satisfying experience. An unusual and interesting combination of styles, and in spite of not really understanding it I did also feel a level of cerebral and emotional engagement.
I'm confident that it makes my 90s ballot, even if it might not quite make my 200 masterpieces list, I would have to reflect on that.
He is a very interesting director, and I'm sure his work has influenced others.
I think your source might be different to mine CQ, but glad you've found it. My copy was not a perfect picture and a couple of issues with the sub-titles, but generally sufficient.