The first Blade was really good, the second one was decent.
The third one was one of the worst movies ever made.... Same goes for Ring 2.
Total Agreement
I actually think the first blade movie is a classic action movie and the best vampire film of all time (interview with a vampire, close second) and it has also aged extremley well, with all the fight scenes and dialouge looking like they belong in 2010 at least.(1998)
I really enjoyed the 2nd one too, a lot more than i thought i would, it was a near perfect sequel
now the third one they just managed to get EVERYTHING wrong
the action/fight scene was ****, that whistlers daughter character fit the stereotype of a chick in an action movie who has to have NO PERSONALITY
the pretty much removed everything likable about blade from the film, and left him with dull short lines that were instantly forgettable. The main villan was crap, the sub villains were corny (Triple H?) and the plot was just wierd. But the biggest crime in that entire film was this:
Hannibal King is NOTHING like this in the comics but the blood sucking film makers (ha!) had to find a way to akwardly shove in a selling point for the douchey,budwieser drinking, roofie slipping, gamecube playing, axe bodyspraying, dudebro fratboy market, with this unfunny predictable peice of ****.
Now i know ryan reynolds can technically act, he was the highlight of that god awful wolverine movie, (before his mouth was shut) and that film were hes trapped in the coffin was quite gripping. but he plays too many 'funny guy' roles and its killing his career just watch green lantern.
but yeah, on the whole blade is cool!
Reply to Topic
