Howard The Duck -
That's just painful really. I admit, I only watched it while I was on the computer (which I think helped as I watched a reaction to it yesterday and I was bored/disheartened when I realised how much more of the film
they had to watch. What I can't decide is whether watching it like that earned it the .5 or the 1

) but just how wrong did this go? Or is it exactly what he wanted? Given his output since and what he's done to and with those films/franchises, I could believe that this is very much what he wanted and any changes he'd make to it now could make it even worse. I don't know the original source, so my main theory is that something 'gritty' was given the Lucas treatment and all that was good/worthwhile was washed out of it in a barrage of kid friendly, 80's nonsense and one eye on the merch/sequel train? For all its very many faults, it did feel very familiar and not just because I'd seen it once before when it came out in the 80's (when I simply wrote it off as a bad kids film) but because it feels like the grandfather to many of todays Hollywood films, kids films for adults. This feels very much a prototype born too early, a first attempt out of time and served to an audience who expect or, even, demand more. You could argue that Star Wars was really the first attempt, but it's structure and narrartive are far more conventional and hit so many classic storytelling devices that you can't help be carried along with it. But had it been this cartoony, surely even Star Wars would've fallen foul?
As a curio, I think it has worth. As an artefact, I think it has worth. As a film to actually watch for fun? Rather you than me.